BotCurrent↗
← Back to examples

Community recipe · Tool workflows

Choose dinner from ingredients and cooking history

Source-backed example. Practical decision guidance is proposed and untested; this is not a full implementation guide.

The problem

Choosing dinner becomes repetitive when available ingredients and recently cooked meals are not considered together.

Agent job

Rank cookable recipes from recorded ingredients and meal history, then log the confirmed choice and update ingredient quantities.

Expected output

Ranked meal suggestions and approved meal-history and ingredient updates.

Where this framing comes from
  • Core problem: Editorial purpose framing
  • Agent job: Editorial purpose framing
  • Expected output: Editorial purpose framing
  • Relevant job roles: Editorial purpose framing
  • Benefit type: Editorial purpose framing
Editorial framing and outcome limits

Describes the task’s purpose and intended output; measured benefit, safe unsupervised operation and successful delivery are not established by this framing.

Editorial synthesis based on the linked source. This framing does not add evidence of successful delivery or results.

Case-specific decision guidance · untested

Case-specific decision guidance and first checks are original proposals. The linked source supports the attributed task; this added guidance has not been executed.

Read the attributed source evidence and original caveats below ↓

Why use this

  1. A household deciding dinner may have an ingredient list that is incomplete or stale and meal history that makes some options repetitive. Treating every recorded ingredient as available can produce a suggestion that cannot actually be cooked.

  2. A reviewable meal shortlist could separate clearly supported options from those needing an ingredient check. Logging the confirmed choice separately would avoid consuming pantry quantities merely because a recipe was suggested.

Why an agent / simpler alternative

Useful judgment

Compare recipe needs, available quantities and recent meals while exposing uncertain substitutions.

Simpler alternative

Choose from a fixed meal rotation when ingredients are reliably stocked.

Unsuitable when

Allergy, dietary or food-safety requirements are missing or require medical guidance.

Proposed inputs

  1. Name

    Ingredient and meal-history snapshot

    Owner

    Cook

    Minimum scope

    Relevant quantities, units and recent meals

    Quality check

    Mark estimated stock and unknown freshness.

  2. Name

    Recipe and dietary constraints

    Owner

    Cook

    Minimum scope

    Approved recipes and explicitly stated exclusions

    Quality check

    Do not infer allergens, safe substitutions or clinical dietary targets.

Access and setup — proposed or unknown

Proposed minimum
  1. Read-only recipe, pantry and history extracts; private candidate list.

Compatibility unknowns
  1. Unknown: exact runtime, meal-planning plugin and quantity-update behavior.

External actions requiring approval
  1. Saving inferred ingredients, recording meals or changing inventory without confirmed intent.

Expected deliverable and review checks

Proposed artifact

Ranked recipe candidates with missing ingredients and proposed post-confirmation quantity changes.

Critical checks
  1. Recipe quantities use comparable units.

  2. Suggestions do not automatically create a cooked-meal record or imply ingredient safety.

Missing output evidence

No recipe preparation, plugin call or pantry update occurs in this overlay.

Failure signals and proposed responses

  1. Signal

    The pantry quantity is an old estimate.

    Why it matters

    A supposedly cookable meal may lack an essential ingredient.

    Proposed response

    Mark availability uncertain and request a pantry check.

  2. Signal

    Considering a recipe deducts ingredients immediately.

    Why it matters

    The pantry record could drift before anything is cooked.

    Proposed response

    Keep deductions proposed until the owner confirms the relevant action.

Effort and cost — unknown

Setup work
  1. Normalize pantry units and identify explicit food constraints.

Ongoing review
  1. Confirm chosen meals and reconcile actual ingredient use.

Unknowns
  1. Unknown: plugin costs, pantry accuracy and recipe coverage.

First check — proposed, unexecuted

Status

proposed_unexecuted

Synthetic fixture

Fictional recipes share an ingredient with uncertain stock; one repeats yesterday’s meal and neither has been selected.

Acceptance checks
  1. Uncertain availability is visible.

  2. No inventory or history change is marked complete.

Stop conditions
  1. A dietary assumption or unconfirmed ingredient inference is required.

Limits

  1. Editorial meal-planning aid; no health, freshness or recipe-success assurance is established.

Tasks: Home & errandsHealth & wellbeingEmail & messages

Useful for: Personal and household

Editorial relevance from the title and source-supported actions; not evidence of the operator’s occupation.
Hermes AgentIndependent testing: No

Editorial candidate. This is source-backed reporting or a documented workflow. BotCurrent has not independently tested this task. A proposed Canadian adaptation is not evidence of a Canadian deployment or compliance certification.

Original source

https://github.com/sergiparpal/meal-manager ↗

Attributed to: sergiparpal

Community recipe
Original action type
tool_action
What the source supports
Hermes calls a meal-planning plugin to rank cookable recipes from recorded ingredients and meal history, then records the selected meal and updates ingredient quantities.
Source outcome limits
This community recipe describes a procedure; it does not prove successful execution or independently reproduced results.
Evidence attribution caveat
This community recipe describes a procedure; it does not prove successful execution or independently reproduced results.
Source approval description
Skill requires confirmation before saving inferred recipe ingredients; subsequent meal logging can follow a confirmed intent to cook.
Named tools
Hermes Agent, Meal Manager, local JSON state, Python
Model or version
Unknown
Publication date
Unknown
Source last checked
2026-10-14
Demonstrated in Canada
Unknown
Canadian availability
Unknown
Proposed Canadian adaptation
Proposed only: check local ingredient names, metric quantities, allergies and food-safety assumptions; test state updates with fictional inventory.
Recommended approval boundaries
Confirm recipe ingredients and meal logging; ask before destructive inventory clearing or purchases.