Convert researched writing into editable visual content

Why use this

1. A writer can finish a researched article and still face a separate editorial task turning it into a short visual sequence. Condensing the argument risks dropping qualifiers, evidence or the connection between consecutive points.

2. This job could create an editable carousel draft whose panels remain traceable to the article. A reviewer can check whether the visual summary stands on its own while preserving the limits of the original claims.

Why an agent / simpler alternative

Useful judgment

Select a coherent sequence of core points, simplify wording and identify where visual compression would change meaning.

Simpler alternative

Use a standard carousel template when approved short copy already exists.

Unsuitable when

The topic requires nuance that cannot fit the format without materially misleading the audience.

Proposed inputs

1. Name

   Topic/evidence brief

   Owner

   Author

   Minimum scope

   Scope, audience and permitted research sources

   Quality check

   Distinguish verified claims from questions

2. Name

   Article and brand rules

   Owner

   Author

   Minimum scope

   Approved draft or source pack plus visual constraints

   Quality check

   Identify mandatory qualifiers, citations and image rights

Access and setup — proposed or unknown

Proposed minimum

1. Begin with an article-to-panel outline and private text draft; no design-account connection or publication.

Compatibility unknowns

1. Current research/design integrations, editable export behavior and exact runtime compatibility are unknown.

External actions requiring approval

1. Uploading private materials, creating third-party design drafts, purchasing assets or publishing requires approval.

Expected deliverable and review checks

Proposed artifact

Article draft and carousel storyboard with claim-to-panel references and editable-layout requirements.

Critical checks

1. Preserve qualifiers; verify each panel's evidence; check standalone meaning, reading order and text density.

Missing output evidence

This overlay adds no new output inspection, execution or validation; consult the referenced canonical source outcome limits.

Failure signals and proposed responses

1. Signal

   A caveat disappears from the headline panel

   Why it matters

   The summary overstates the research

   Proposed response

   Retain the qualifier or redesign the panel sequence.

2. Signal

   A decorative chart implies unsupported numbers

   Why it matters

   Visual polish introduces a new factual claim

   Proposed response

   Replace it with a nonquantitative illustration or source-backed figure.

Effort and cost — unknown

Setup work

1. Define audience, narrative arc and source boundaries.

Ongoing review

1. Review factual compression and eventual design editability.

Unknowns

1. Research depth, image rights, layout revisions and service costs are unknown.

First check — proposed, unexecuted

Status

proposed_unexecuted

Synthetic fixture

Invent a short article with three claims, one caveat and one unresolved question; outline a four-panel carousel without generating a design.

Acceptance checks

1. Retain the caveat; separate the open question; link panels to article passages; make no publication claim.

Stop conditions

1. Stop if compression requires unsupported claims or the design step needs unapproved uploads.

Limits

1. An attractive visual summary cannot establish the article's accuracy, originality or audience engagement.