Official recipe
Generate product-grounded mascot directions for owner selection
A mascot can look appealing while misrepresenting the product.
Candidate images and an owner decision sheet.
What you need: Source-named agent: Hermes Agent. Suggested inputs: Fictional product brief; Visual boundaries. Use a scratch output folder and a brief containing no confidential material. Agree candidate quantity and provider permissions. Workflow costs and current compatibility remain unverified.
Approve external brief or asset transmission, paid generation and any later brand adoption or publication.
Official recipe. BotCurrent has not independently tested this workflow.
Setup and access
Proposed inputs
- Name
Fictional product brief
- Owner
Product owner
- Minimum scope
Fictional purpose, audience and personality
- Quality check
Exclude claims and customer details that cannot leave the project.
- Name
Visual boundaries
- Owner
Design owner
- Minimum scope
Colors, excluded motifs, display size
- Quality check
Make the constraints measurable without requiring an existing brand character.
Access and setup — proposed or unknown
- Proposed minimum
Use a scratch output folder and a brief containing no confidential material.
Agree candidate quantity and provider permissions.
- Compatibility unknowns
Unknown: available image-generation provider, asset licensing, costs and actual visual quality.
- External actions requiring approval
Approve external brief or asset transmission, paid generation and any later brand adoption or publication.
Detailed steps and output format
At a glance
- Suggested result
- Candidate images and an owner decision sheet.Suggested; untested.
- Tool
- Hermes AgentSource-named; check current access.
- Suggested inputs
- Fictional product brief; Visual boundariesProposed; access notes below.
- Human review
- Approve external brief or asset transmission, paid generation and any later brand adoption or publication.Suggested boundaries; source approvals below.
- Setup notes
- Use a scratch output folder and a brief containing no confidential material. Agree candidate quantity and provider permissions.Guide notes; proposed setup untested.
- Cost
- Workflow cost not established. Check current tool pricing, setup and human review costs before trying it.No measured cost or time added.
- Content depth
- Source-linked example · suggestions untestedDepth does not establish successful execution.
Function and scope
Creative production, Marketing · Single task
Editorial classification; no execution or compatibility test is implied.
No tool mapping reviewed for this task.
Source-backed example. Practical decision guidance is proposed and untested; this is not a full implementation guide.
The problem
A mascot can look appealing while misrepresenting the product.
Suggested task · untested
Compare product-linked character directions before selecting one.
What you could produce
Candidate images and an owner decision sheet.
Where these suggestions come from
- Core problem: Our suggestion; no result reported by the source
- Agent job: Our suggestion; no result reported by the source
- Expected output: Our suggestion; no result reported by the source
- Relevant job roles: Our suggestion; no result reported by the source
- Benefit type: Our suggestion; no result reported by the source
Suggestions and their limits
Describes the proposed purpose and review output; measured benefit and successful delivery are not established.
Editorial synthesis based on the linked source. This framing does not add evidence of successful delivery or results.
Before you try it · suggestions untested
Source-derived guidance is attributed and budgeted. The fictional check and proposed oversight do not establish execution, generated quality or customer outcomes.
Read the attributed source evidence and original caveats below ↓
Why use this
Different concepts expose branding choices before refinement.
Selection still needs designer judgment.
Why an agent / simpler alternative
- Useful judgment
Relate product purpose to character.
- Simpler alternative
Use a licensed stock symbol or ask a designer for a single concept when the identity direction is already settled.
- Unsuitable when
The task requires a legal clearance opinion, imitation of an existing character, or a final production logo without designer review.
Expected deliverable and review checks
- Proposed artifact
Candidate images and an owner decision sheet.
- Critical checks
Distinct product associations.
Traceable requirements.
Recognition and rights unresolved.
- Missing output evidence
No completed deliverable from this recipe was inspected.
First check — proposed, unexecuted
- Status
proposed_unexecuted
- Synthetic fixture
An invented library app helps adults resume unfinished books. Its owner wants a calm character without an owl, book-shaped face or text. Compare three written directions before generation.
- Acceptance checks
Book-resumption association.
No prohibited motifs.
Separate adoption review.
- Stop conditions
Stop before image generation or upload in this first check.
Stop if the brief relies on copying an existing mascot.
Tasks: Email & messages
Useful for: General use
Editorial relevance from the title and source-supported actions; not evidence of the operator’s occupation.Failure handling, costs and limits
Failure signals and proposed responses
- Signal
Same metaphor
- Why it matters
Superficial choice.
- Proposed response
Request distinct directions.
- Signal
A character resembles a known brand
- Why it matters
Similarity may make adoption unsuitable even if generation succeeded.
- Proposed response
Exclude it from adoption pending qualified rights review.
- Signal
Unreadable when small
- Why it matters
Recognition fails.
- Proposed response
Inspect actual display size.
Effort and cost — unknown
- Setup work
Agree essential product associations.
- Ongoing review
Record what the owner selected and which unresolved checks still prevent adoption.
- Unknowns
Unknown: generation charges, designer cleanup, rights review and iteration time; no savings are established.
Limits
This offline planning check does not establish generated-image quality, legal availability or suitability as a trademark.
Full source evidence
Official recipe · Tool workflows
Original task title: Generate product-grounded mascot directions for owner selection
Editorial candidate. This is source-backed reporting or a documented workflow. BotCurrent has not independently tested this task. A proposed Canadian adaptation is not evidence of a Canadian deployment or compliance certification.
Original source
https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/blob/main/optional-skills/creative/ip-as-logo/SKILL.md ↗Attributed to: s1dashu; adapted for Hermes
Official recipe- Original action type
- tool_action
- What the source reports
- Reads product context, proposes character directions, calls image generation for an approved batch and returns labeled candidates.
- Source outcome limits
- Recipe delivers every generated candidate without automatic conformance review; small-size readability, uniqueness and trademark clearance are unproved.
- Evidence attribution caveat
- This official recipe describes a procedure; it does not prove successful execution or independently reproduced results.
- Source approval description
- Confirms directions and batch quantity unless already authorized.
- Named tools
- Hermes Agent; ip-as-logo
- Model or version
- Skill 1.0.0; runtime/model unknown
- Publication date
- Unknown
- Source last checked
- 2026-10-14
- Demonstrated in Canada
- Unknown
- Canadian availability
- Unknown
- Proposed Canadian adaptation
- Proposed: review applicable rights, privacy and data scope before use.
- Recommended approval boundaries
- Approve external brief or asset transmission, paid generation and any later brand adoption or publication.