BotCurrent↗
← Back to examples

Official recipe · Browser tasks

Screen a sector by published market capitalization

Source-backed example. Practical decision guidance is proposed and untested; this is not a full implementation guide.

The problem

A sector screen requires comparable company identifiers and market sizes instead of an unstructured list of names.

Agent job

Filter listed companies by sector and capitalization range and collect their basic market details.

Expected output

A sector-screening table with tickers, countries and capitalization.

Where this framing comes from
  • Core problem: Editorial purpose framing
  • Agent job: Editorial purpose framing
  • Expected output: Editorial purpose framing
  • Relevant job roles: Editorial purpose framing
  • Benefit type: Editorial purpose framing
Editorial framing and outcome limits

Describes the task’s purpose and intended output; measured benefit, safe unsupervised operation and successful delivery are not established by this framing.

Editorial synthesis based on the linked source. This framing does not add evidence of successful delivery or results.

Case-specific decision guidance · untested

Case-specific decision guidance and first checks are original proposals. The linked source supports the attributed task; this added guidance has not been executed.

Read the attributed source evidence and original caveats below ↓

Why use this

  1. A financial researcher screening a sector may encounter company names, tickers and capitalizations that differ by listing or observation date. A range filter can appear precise while mixing currencies or stale figures.

  2. This job could organize a transparent screen with the comparison basis and source dates visible. The result should help the reader inspect the chosen universe, rather than implying that a company fits an investment objective merely because it falls inside a size range.

Why an agent / simpler alternative

Useful judgment

Resolve listed-company identity, align capitalization basis and explain ambiguous sector classification.

Simpler alternative

Use a financial data provider's built-in screen when the universe and definitions are already suitable.

Unsuitable when

The task would recommend investments, infer suitability or trade on unverified screening data.

Proposed inputs

  1. Name

    Screen definition

    Owner

    Research owner

    Minimum scope

    Sector scope, capitalization range and comparison currency

    Quality check

    Define inclusions and treatment of multiple listings

  2. Name

    Published market data

    Owner

    Permitted source

    Minimum scope

    Company IDs, tickers, countries, values and dates

    Quality check

    Check listing identity and units

Access and setup — proposed or unknown

Proposed minimum
  1. Use fictional company rows and a proposed screen; no live market-data retrieval, broker access or financial action.

Compatibility unknowns
  1. Current data freshness, sector taxonomy, licensing and runtime compatibility are unknown.

External actions requiring approval
  1. Paid data access, sharing private investment context and any financial transaction requires appropriate authorization.

Expected deliverable and review checks

Proposed artifact

Screening-table candidate with inclusion rationale, currency/date basis and unresolved classification or identity questions.

Critical checks
  1. Avoid mixing capitalization definitions/currencies; preserve borderline and stale entries; distinguish country labels from exchange location.

Missing output evidence

This overlay adds no new output inspection, execution or validation; consult the referenced canonical source outcome limits.

Failure signals and proposed responses

  1. Signal

    The same company appears under two listings

    Why it matters

    The screen double-counts an entity

    Proposed response

    Group by verified company identity and explain listing choices.

  2. Signal

    One value is expressed in different units

    Why it matters

    The range filter produces a false match

    Proposed response

    Normalize documented units or hold the row.

Effort and cost — unknown

Setup work
  1. Define the universe and comparable value basis.

Ongoing review
  1. Researcher verifies current figures before consequential use.

Unknowns
  1. Data latency, classification quality, licensing and research costs are unknown.

First check — proposed, unexecuted

Status

proposed_unexecuted

Synthetic fixture

Invent six listed-company rows with duplicate listings, mixed units and one stale date; prepare a provisional screen.

Acceptance checks
  1. Flag duplicates/units; preserve dates; make no investment ranking or trade suggestion.

Stop conditions
  1. Stop if identity or the capitalization basis cannot be established.

Limits

  1. A sector screen cannot establish valuation, financial quality or suitability for any investor.

Tasks: Money & accounting

Useful for: Finance professionalResearcher

Editorial relevance from the title and source-supported actions; not evidence of the operator’s occupation.
Browser UseIndependent testing: No

Editorial candidate. This is source-backed reporting or a documented workflow. BotCurrent has not independently tested this task. A proposed Canadian adaptation is not evidence of a Canadian deployment or compliance certification.

Original source

https://browser-use.com/showcase/public-cybersecurity-stocks ↗

Attributed to: Browser Use

Official recipe
Original action type
browser_action
What the source supports
Filter publicly traded cybersecurity companies by market-cap range and list ticker, country and capitalization.
Source outcome limits
This official recipe describes a procedure; it does not prove successful execution or independently reproduced results.
Evidence attribution caveat
This official recipe describes a procedure; it does not prove successful execution or independently reproduced results.
Source approval description
Not specified.
Named tools
Browser Use; companiesmarketcap.com
Model or version
Unknown
Publication date
Unknown
Source last checked
2026-10-14
Demonstrated in Canada
Unknown
Canadian availability
unverified
Proposed Canadian adaptation
Normalize CAD versus USD, timestamp prices and handle dual-listed issuers; research only, no trades or suitability claim.
Recommended approval boundaries
Approve account access and any personal-data disclosure. Review before purchases, bookings, messages, archive requests, uploads or publication. Keep research read-only where possible.