Shortlist fresh remote job openings

Why use this

1. A jobseeker can spend attention on a recently surfaced advert that was posted much earlier, or on a remote role restricted to a country where they cannot work. Repeated filtering still leaves ambiguous eligibility details.

2. This job could produce a compact set of openings with the evidence needed to decide what deserves a closer read. Explicit uncertainty prevents an attractive title from silently becoming a claim that the role is available or suitable.

Why an agent / simpler alternative

Useful judgment

Interpret remote-location restrictions, role scope and recency together, while preserving unresolved criteria.

Simpler alternative

Use saved job-board searches when one title and one geography describe the target well.

Unsuitable when

The task requires deciding hiring eligibility or applying without the person's review.

Proposed inputs

1. Name

   Search criteria

   Owner

   Jobseeker

   Minimum scope

   Role families, required skills, work location and recency preference

   Quality check

   Separate must-haves from preferences

2. Name

   Job adverts

   Owner

   Authorized job-board view

   Minimum scope

   Posting text, URL, displayed dates and location limits

   Quality check

   Record whether dates mean posted, updated or collected

Access and setup — proposed or unknown

Proposed minimum

1. Read-only job-board access where permitted; no resume or application-profile access for shortlisting.

Compatibility unknowns

1. Exact board filters, login requirements and current browser/runtime compatibility are unknown.

External actions requiring approval

1. Do not apply; messages, profile changes and resume sharing would require a separate request and approval.

Expected deliverable and review checks

Proposed artifact

Shortlist with employer, role, URL, date evidence, remote restrictions and unresolved fit questions.

Critical checks

1. Verify each mandatory filter against advert text; distinguish worldwide remote from location-limited remote.

Missing output evidence

No inspected shortlist or hiring-outcome evidence is provided by this overlay.

Failure signals and proposed responses

1. Signal

   Remote badge conflicts with advert text

   Why it matters

   A superficially relevant role may be ineligible

   Proposed response

   Prefer the explicit restriction and flag the conflict.

2. Signal

   An old advert is labelled newly updated

   Why it matters

   Recency may reflect editing rather than a fresh vacancy

   Proposed response

   Record both dates and avoid claiming a new opening.

Effort and cost — unknown

Setup work

1. Define role synonyms and geographic constraints.

Ongoing review

1. Recheck that shortlisted adverts remain accessible.

Unknowns

1. Board access charges, review effort and vacancy freshness are unknown.

First check — proposed, unexecuted

Status

proposed_unexecuted

Synthetic fixture

Invent four adverts: fresh local-remote, stale remote, fresh onsite, and fresh remote with an incompatible jurisdiction.

Acceptance checks

1. Include only evidenced matches; explain exclusions; emit no application or employer contact.

Stop conditions

1. Stop if a required restriction is missing or access demands unapproved profile changes.

Limits

1. Advertised availability and fit remain employer claims; a shortlist is not an eligibility determination.